Now I could stand to drop a *little* weight, but nothing like 50 lbs. So why am I talking about this non-diet diet? Because I think his approach was good: it's nutritionally focused, not energy/calorie focused. And instead of only telling me what NOT to eat (although he does that as well), his lists emphasize what I SHOULD eat.
So here they are (the comments in parentheses are mine):
Eat Daily
- fruits
- whole grains
- leafy greens
- nuts (healthy fats)
- carrots (an orange food = beta-carotene)
- green teas
- oily fish (more healthy fats)
- yogurt
- broccoli
- sweet potato (another orange food)
- avocado (still more healthy fats)
- red meat (animal protein)
- pasta
- desserts
- alcohol
Skip Altogether
- fast food
- soda (high in sugars)
- processed meals/frozen dinners
- canned soup (high in sodium)
- "diet" foods
Sadly, these lists are a lot more clear (to me, at least) than the government-approved food pyramid, and I think NPR and the Washington Post agree:
"[A]s in the past, translating scientific data into clear and useful recommendations poses political pitfalls. The [government's dietary] advisory committee's emphasis on a 'plant-based' diet, for example, has caused much consternation among the powerful egg and meat lobbies who say the term might be misunderstood as advocating a vegetarian diet. ... By law, the guidelines must reflect the recommendations from the scientific advisory committee. But policymakers have broad discretion about how and whether to update the food pyramid. The current version, called MyPyramid, was unveiled in 2005 and has been widely judged a failure. ..." - from the WashPost
Obviously something's not working, since recent studies have found that 40% of kids' diets come from "empty calories" (TIME) and affluent Americans are increasing, not decreasing, their consumption of junk food (WSJ). Bummer. If only the government could give it to us straight, instead of obfuscating the facts for the sake of the big food lobbies ...
Note: The photo above was found here.
Now that sounds like something I could actually do. I like you don't need to lose 50 pounds but maybe a few around the problem areas as I call them. Thanks for posting and I'm anticipating reading your blog adventures.
ReplyDeleteNow that sounds like something I could actually do. I like you don't need to lose 50 pounds but maybe a few around the problem areas as I call them. Thanks for posting and I'm anticipating reading your blog adventures.
ReplyDelete